Quick disclaimer, some of the worst things in my life have come from prideful and mean-spirited competition, where I am being very unloving.
With competition in the market, an innovative company is rewarded for setting the pace for an industry. For example, Apple creates the iPhone, and then other phone companies are pushed to create similarly awesome phones. Those companies might also be pushed to find their own niche of people, like the practical low-budget niche where I get my phones.
The allowance of competition (without which there would be a single seller/monopoly) leads to two benefits that I will discuss. 1. The incentive to improve a product at a given price (or decrease the price of a given product). 2. Increased variety of products.
1. If company A does not take advantage of opportunities to improve their product, when the benefit of that improvement would exceed the cost, then their competitors will do so, and company A will go out of business, leaving only the better companies.
2. Competition leads companies to look for niches, groups of people to whom only they will sell. Interestingly, this means that they're looking for a way to avoid the competition. As they go searching for these groups of people, they find unique ways to really please the customers that they find.
Now for the tie-in to the rulings. At a recent BYU Religious Freedom event, Alexander Dushku presented the idea that supporters of traditional marriage should try to make it so that these rulings end up like the Roe v. Wade ruling, not like how civil rights ended up. Meaning, we don't want supporters of traditional marriage to be outcast from from the public square for discriminating, but rather we want their views to be heard as reasonable, like how you can be pro-life or pro-choice and still be seen as a reasonable person.
This can be accomplished if traditional marriage supporters continue to publish their well-thought-out and loving views, rather than letting their views disappear.
I see two benefits from promoting an open discussion of gay marriage, connected to my comments on competition:
1. Both the supporters of same-sex marriage and the supporters of traditional marriage have the incentive to thoroughly analyze what they're doing and improve their purpose.
2. Both sides are incentivized to consider how each group of people in society is affected by their actions as they strive to win increased support.
I believe that an open and understanding discussion will invite the Spirit to help us learn.
My support for traditional marriage stems largely from my testimony of the principle that bodies are "of God, and ye are not your own" (1 Corinthians 6:19).
I know that I have a lot to learn on this topic though, and I hope to hear your comments to help me! : )
In games, it can be a playful way to create a lot of energy. I am bored by sports-hence why I start wandering around aimlessly partway through the occasional game that I'm coaxed into playing. I would probably get better exercise if I was a little more competitive in that arena.


The allowance of competition (without which there would be a single seller/monopoly) leads to two benefits that I will discuss. 1. The incentive to improve a product at a given price (or decrease the price of a given product). 2. Increased variety of products.
1. If company A does not take advantage of opportunities to improve their product, when the benefit of that improvement would exceed the cost, then their competitors will do so, and company A will go out of business, leaving only the better companies.
2. Competition leads companies to look for niches, groups of people to whom only they will sell. Interestingly, this means that they're looking for a way to avoid the competition. As they go searching for these groups of people, they find unique ways to really please the customers that they find.
Now for the tie-in to the rulings. At a recent BYU Religious Freedom event, Alexander Dushku presented the idea that supporters of traditional marriage should try to make it so that these rulings end up like the Roe v. Wade ruling, not like how civil rights ended up. Meaning, we don't want supporters of traditional marriage to be outcast from from the public square for discriminating, but rather we want their views to be heard as reasonable, like how you can be pro-life or pro-choice and still be seen as a reasonable person.
This can be accomplished if traditional marriage supporters continue to publish their well-thought-out and loving views, rather than letting their views disappear.
I see two benefits from promoting an open discussion of gay marriage, connected to my comments on competition:
1. Both the supporters of same-sex marriage and the supporters of traditional marriage have the incentive to thoroughly analyze what they're doing and improve their purpose.
2. Both sides are incentivized to consider how each group of people in society is affected by their actions as they strive to win increased support.
I believe that an open and understanding discussion will invite the Spirit to help us learn.

My support for traditional marriage stems largely from my testimony of the principle that bodies are "of God, and ye are not your own" (1 Corinthians 6:19).
I know that I have a lot to learn on this topic though, and I hope to hear your comments to help me! : )




