Dear Senator,
I was disappointed to see you did not support the bipartisan border security proposal earlier this month. The bill is clearly progress. It increases the administration’s capacity and obligation to enforce the law, creates a clear and legal point at which the border can be shut down entirely, and allows more applicants for asylum to work legally (as opposed to the current system where they must work illegally for six months or rely on public support). If you are concerned that the current administration simply will not enforce the law, it is surprising that more legal challenges have not been pursued. Last year, in U.S. v. Texas, a majority of the Supreme Court, including justices nominated by Democratic and Republican presidents, expressed there would likely be standing to sue “if the Executive Branch wholly abandoned its statutory responsibilities” related to immigration. A clearer law allowing a shutdown of the border would make that case even stronger.
I am not convinced, however, that the current administration is willfully allowing chaos to reign at the border, and in fact it seems clear that getting a better handle on the border would improve approval ratings for the president. I fear that Representative Nehls’s response to the bill may reflect the response of some senators: “I will not help the Democrats try to improve this man’s dismal approval ratings.” Or worse, some senators may simply fear criticism of former President Trump. It is sadly ironic that the former president, who supposedly has border security as his strong point, may be the reason that a bill to improve the border is not passing. Donald Trump, and those who follow his lead, apparently only want an improved border if Donald Trump will get credit for it.
Some Republicans clearly fly figurative (or literal) pro-Trump or anti-Biden flags above the American flag, and perhaps you cannot do right by them unless you do whatever increases Donald Trump's chances of winning. But as stated by James Madison in Federalist 10, our constitutional system is set up to “refine and enlarge the public views, by passing them through the medium of a chosen body of citizens, whose wisdom may best discern the true interest of their country, and whose patriotism and love of justice will be least likely to sacrifice it to temporary or partial considerations.”
Perhaps the situation is more complicated than I realize, but it seems to me that a simple policy of supporting bills that improve the law would do a lot of good for our country. The game of waiting for a bill that does “enough” to improve border security seems to be a never ending game.
As for me and many individuals that I know, including many other Republicans, we would like to see improvement of the immigration laws even if a perfect solution cannot be reached yet. I sadly see what James Madison hoped would be alleviated by our constitutional system, that leaders “of factious tempers, of local prejudices, or of sinister designs, may, by intrigue, by corruption, or by other means, first obtain the suffrages, and then betray the interests, of the people.” We must be above simply going along with antagonistic attitudes, avoiding “factions” as the Founding Fathers would say.
The current chaos at the border has real negative consequences on real people. Fentanyl and other dangerous drugs flood our country, killing many young people before their prime. Cities previously unaffected such as New York City face devastating economic and logistical problems. True asylum seekers are swallowed up in a clogged system. Border states are overwhelmed without the help they deserve from the federal government. If this deal is weaker than some wish, and Donald Trump can do better, he should win an election and work with congress to make another bill that strengthens the border even further. But until then, Congress should do its job and stop playing politics with people’s lives in order to appease Mr. Trump.
I feel this bill, or something similar that could be accepted by a bipartisan majority, would save lives of people around us, by decreasing dangerous drugs that cross the border, and would help people fleeing persecution to start their lives here in a responsible and safe way—working legally for an employer who follows immigration and labor laws. I believe these people are children of God, and deserve to have us work for these changes, not months down the road when new legislators and administrations might do something that one party thinks is even better, but right now.
Thank you for your service, and I will pray for you in your efforts to help our country.
Rees Atkins



